McWhirter's 1938 book contains a long business cycle, a monthly reading for the exchange, and an individual-stock method based on a company's founding date. The book does not arrange those pieces as a working sequence. This letter explains the sequence and the limits of the historical record before you decide whether the course fits your research.
Here is what she put in it. A slow astronomical cycle, counted and dated, mapped against more than a century of business history. A recurring lunar rhythm read against a horoscope built for the New York Stock Exchange itself — she originated that idea. One stock worked all the way through, U.S. Steel, timed against its incorporation date rather than its chart. And a projection of the long cycle carried forward to 1950, printed in 1938, for years she had no way to see.
That last one is the whole reason this letter exists. Anyone can explain a crash after it happens.
So you found the book. A footnote in a Gann text, a scanned PDF passed around a forum, a title promising the thing every chart hides: the month, read before it opens. You read the 1929 case. You read the U.S. Steel window — 27½ in March 1935, 126½ two years later. Dated. Specific. Checkable. You went back to your own chart to test it.
Then the book closed on you. The terms were technical: slow planetary positions, recurring lunar timing, and secondary factors. The steps were scattered — theory in one chapter, history in another, application in a third, examples from 1929 lying between them. You finished with the snapshot of a method and no idea which layer to build first.
That is not a small problem. In this method the order is the method: a monthly reading near a long-cycle low means close to the opposite of the same reading in a rising phase. Out of sequence, the book is noise. In sequence, a month becomes legible before it opens.
And the chart, meanwhile, gave you nothing it had not already given you. It marks the turn after price confirms it. The gap between those two is the whole of this letter.
This is a method course, not a monthly signal service. You learn to read the market's monthly direction, place it inside the long business cycle, and time individual stocks from their founding dates.
A four-layer reading sequence that ends in a dated monthly bias and individual-stock timing work.
McWhirter's 1938 record, the U.S. Steel rise and fall, and the forward projection she published to 1950.
The later record is mixed. This course teaches reconstruction and testing, not certainty.
AUD $1,994 once. Lifetime access after verification. Version 1 is available now; Version 2 is in development.
A chart is a photograph of what price did. It is exact and it is late. You can study a thousand of them and still not know what kind of month you are walking into. The photograph shows the past with great clarity. It says nothing about the date ahead.
This is not a flaw in your study. It is the ceiling of the whole field you were taught. Market education has three floors, and you have probably walked all of them. Fundamentals explain what a business is worth. That is too slow to time a turn. Technical analysis explains how price has behaved. That is a picture taken after the move. Order flow, Wyckoff, the liquidity work — faster, sharper, but still a reading of price after price has spoken.
Every one of those floors answers the same question in a different accent: what did price just do? None of them answers the question McWhirter built her whole method around. What kind of month is this, before it opens? That layer is not taught in the standard ladder. Most traders never look for it. The few who hear of it call it astrology and walk past, never learning that the clock underneath it is astronomical — counted, dated, and visible years ahead.
So the gap is not that you studied price badly. It is that price is only half the instrument. The chart leaves the reader stuck in four concrete ways.
A reversal pattern confirms after price has already reversed. By the time the chart admits the turn, the move you wanted is over.
The chart cannot tell you what kind of month it is before the month opens. It has no way to form a directional hypothesis in advance.
A monthly reading near a long-cycle low is a different thing than the same reading in a rising phase. The chart shows neither phase.
Seasonality and macro debate are guesses about the same price the chart shows. There is no second, independent timing signal to check them against.
Without that timing layer, you are always reacting. You see the reversal pattern, but only after the reversal. You feel a month go against you, but you had no reading of it before the first trading day. You enter a stock with no sense of whether its own clock favours you. You debate the macro with people who are guessing about the same price you are looking at. Four blind spots, all from the same missing instrument.
A working version needs three things in order. First, where the long cycle sits. Then the directional bias for the month. Then the timing window for the single stock. The next section is how each one is built.
You can find the 1938 book free. What it does not hand you is the sequence: which layer to read first, and how each one changes the meaning of the next.
In the 1930s the best economists admitted the cycle existed and could not be timed. McWhirter would not let that stand.
Booms happened. Busts happened. They repeated. But no one had named a usable time factor. She spent years inside astronomy, business history, and market data, looking for the clock.
She found a point in the sky that traces a slow, repeating loop — one full circuit every 18.6 years. This is not a belief. It is an astronomical count, the same kind that lets an almanac print an eclipse decades early. Mapped against more than a century of business data, the position of that point lined up with the rhythm of expansion and contraction often enough to name.
That is the discovery. Not a magic number, but a clock that is already on the wall of the sky, ticking on a schedule no market participant can move. McWhirter published it in 1938. The method that grew from it reads in four layers, each one feeding the next. The order is the whole thing. Read them out of sequence and you get noise. Read them in order and a month becomes legible before it opens.
You learn to locate the economy inside the 18.6-year cycle McWhirter traced in the sky. The cycle has an expansion phase, a warning phase, a low, and a recovery. Because it runs on an astronomical clock, the phase ahead can be placed years in advance, not guessed at after the fact. From this you build a five-year macro outlook. The positions that mark each phase are taught inside the lessons.
Why this layer comes first: it gives every monthly reading its economic context. A bullish month during economic expansion is different from a bullish month near a long-cycle low, so you weight the same monthly signal differently. Skip this layer and the monthly reading has no wider context. You learn to recognise which phase the economy has entered and roughly when it is due to turn.
You learn to read a recurring monthly chart built for the New York Stock Exchange itself, keyed to the synodic month — the 29.53 days from one lunation to the next, the interval our calendar months are a rounded-off copy of. Setting that reading against the exchange's own founding horoscope was McWhirter's original move; nobody had done it before her. Overlaid with the cycle position and the Secondary Factors, it produces a directional bias for the coming month. The working rules stay inside the course.
This is the layer that does the heaviest work, because it answers the question the chart cannot. What kind of month is this, before the first trade prints? You state the bias in advance, in one sentence, and then you watch price confirm or reject it. Without it you are back to reading photographs. The secondary factors — the slow-moving points that nudge the baseline up or down — are what keep the reading honest, so the same monthly reading does not always mean the same thing. You learn to recognise a supportive month, a heavy month, and a neutral one.
A company has an incorporation date. It was filed and recorded on a real day, and that day fixes a chart of its own. The same timing logic that reads the whole market reads one stock against the day it was born. As slow planets transit that founding chart, the stock moves through windows — some that favour a rise, some that call for caution. You learn to map those windows months ahead and to recognise which is which.
This is the layer that fixed the chart's "always late" problem in her U.S. Steel case. The market-wide reading tells you the climate. The single-stock reading tells you which instrument is in season inside that climate. Without it you can have the month right and still be in the wrong name. The specific rules for reading an incorporation chart stay inside the course; what you take from this letter is that the founding date is a real, datable input, not a guess.
McWhirter read the month from the Moon. David Williams read the year from the Sun. His solar-ingress method adds a second, independent climate layer to her lunar work, and the two read cleanly together. You learn to bring them into one twelve-month forecasting practice, so the monthly bias arrives inside an annual frame.
Why two methods and not one: a single signal can be fooled. Two independent clocks agreeing is stronger evidence than either alone, and two clocks disagreeing is a warning to size down. This is the layer where the work stops being a trick and becomes a discipline. You learn to treat each month as a probability environment, not a command, and to keep the running record that turns a forecast into study rather than a habit.
This is McWhirter's own documented record — not a Skool forecast, and not a promise about any future year. Each case is dated and checkable against the historical price record. All three look backward, and I will say so on every one of them. The one forward projection in her book comes later in this letter, and it is the case I would actually hang the method on.
By her account the long cycle moved into its warning zone in December 1928 and stayed there — the stretch where a boom is running out of road. The bull market peaked in September 1929, roughly nine months later, and fell through the autumn.
Now read the date on the book. 1938. Nine years after the fact.
This is a retrospective demonstration of layer one against an outcome she already knew, not a warning issued in 1928 by a thirty-two-year-old who had not yet published anything. What it shows is that the phase was legible months ahead of price when tested backward. That is worth something. It is not worth what a hindsight-call marketer would tell you it is worth, and the distinction is the reason this section exists.
The original text prints the reading it used for the lunar month beginning in early March 1938, set around a skeleton chart of the exchange. That reading pointed to an unstable month with downward pressure. The month that followed was marked by sharp drops — severe, though nowhere near the 1932 lows.
One caution, and I would rather you hear it from me. The book carrying this case was published later in 1938. I cannot show you a timestamp proving the reading was written and sealed before the month ran, so treat it as a worked demonstration rather than a documented live call. Every case on this page carries that same qualification.
What the case still establishes is scale. The 1929 reading was a tide. This is thirty days, read from a single lunation against the exchange's own chart. The same instrument that reads a decade reads a month — and that is what makes it a method rather than a hunch about long history.
McWhirter traced U.S. Steel against its incorporation date, not against its chart. March 1935: 27½. March 1937: 126½. Those are primary NYSE records, not rounded sales-page numbers, and the move is roughly 360% in twenty-four months. She argued the favourable window was legible in advance from the stock's own founding chart — layer three of the method applied to one name.
Then read the rest of the sentence, because most people quoting this case stop halfway. U.S. Steel itself fell about 70% from that March 1937 high into the 1938 low. Not the Dow — the Dow's own peak-to-trough fall was 49.1%, a different and smaller number. The stock. The same timing that produced the run, running in reverse.
She wrote it up after the move, not before it. It is here so a serious reader can study how one method reaches from the whole economy down to a single share on the same clock, in both directions. It is not a claim about any stock you might buy today.
The rest of this letter exists for readers who need it. If you do not, here is the way in.
AUD $1,994 · One payment · Lifetime access · No change-of-mind refunds once access is released — this does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
This is the long 18.6-year rhythm — the first thing the student learns to read. It shows the shape of the cycle: the rise into expansion, the warning, the low, and the recovery. What it deliberately does not show is the position that marks each phase, because that is the work you come to learn. The shape sells the idea. The reading is the course.
You might think a method from 1938 cannot read a market of index funds, algorithms, and round-the-clock futures. The participants are different. The speed is different. The reasonable doubt is whether anything that old still applies.
Before I answer that, here is the thing I would rather you heard from me than found out in month seven.
The out-of-sample record since 1938 is mixed. Not quietly mixed — properly mixed. A cycle position that historically marked a high point has, in one later era, coincided with a recession instead. A position that historically marked a low has coincided with an expansion. Those are inversions of the original reading, sitting in the actual record, and I know of no way to argue them away. That is a real limitation of the method as McWhirter stated it, and printing it here costs me sales.
I print it anyway, for two reasons. The alternative is you paying AUD $1,994 for a story and finding the caveat yourself in month seven. And what sits on the other side of that caveat is better than the caveat is bad.
Which brings me to the case I would actually stake this method on. It is not 1929.
In the same 1938 volume, McWhirter carried the long business cycle forward to 1950. Twelve years of phase positions, printed in advance, for years she could not see and could not quietly revise afterwards. No hindsight available. No chapter written later to tidy it up. She put it on paper and let the calendar grade her.
That is the one forward claim in the book, made by a researcher who had every incentive to stay with safe retrospectives instead. It is also the first thing this course puts in front of you, because a dated projection is the only kind of claim that can be honestly tested. You rebuild it yourself, from the cycle position up, and you see for yourself where it held and where it did not.
So: a mixed record, real inversions, one real forward projection, and a method you are taught to test rather than trust. Now, the modern market.
What the method reads is not the instruments. It is the timing layer underneath them. The long cycle still runs its 18.6-year circuit. The synodic month still arrives every 29.53 days. Those astronomical periods did not stop in 1938. Markets became faster and algorithms changed execution speed, but the underlying calendar did not change.
What the new instruments added is speed and crowding, and crowding is exactly what a timing layer is built to sit above. A faster market still has months. It still has a tone you can read before the first day. It also still inverts. Months arrive expressing the expected pressure in the opposite direction — our own reading of the record, and what we call the polarity flip. Our term, not McWhirter’s. So the discipline holds either way: read the month as a probability, watch how price responds, review the result honestly.
This is also where the teaching changes shape. A book hands you the rule and leaves. The course shows you the work being done. You watch a month read from its own recurring lunar chart, written down before it runs, then reviewed against what price did. You watch a forecast that inverted, and you watch the read that should have flagged the flip. The skill you cannot get from the 1938 text is judgement, and judgement only forms over the shoulder of someone who has run the practice for years.
So the modern market does not break the method. It tests it, the way every month has. You read the cycle, state the bias, and let the live structure confirm or reject it. The objection resolves the first time you run a monthly forecast and watch the date arrive.
The cap is not a sales tactic. Specialist research loses its value when it turns into a crowd, so the seats are kept few and every student is verified.
The method does not expire, and we make no claim about a specific market window. What is finite is the room. Once 150 seats are filled, enrolment is closed until a place opens.
Waiting costs you the months you could have spent reading. This skill is not bought once and finished. It compounds. Each month you forecast, watch, and review adds a case to your own record, and that record is where the judgement lives. Twelve months from now you will either have twelve worked months behind you or none.
That is the real cost of waiting a season. Not a missed discount, but a year of cases you did not run. The student who starts this month is reading her own twelfth forecast by the time next year's student reads his first. The clock McWhirter read keeps moving whether you study it or not.
A forecasting method that circulates free stops being an instrument. It becomes a slogan, repeated by people who never learned to apply it. You have seen this happen. A real idea gets stripped to a catchphrase, the catchphrase gets sold, and the careful version drowns under the noise. That outcome devalues the study for the students who paid to learn it properly, which is why the room is gated.
You are buying a skill, not a feed. A signal expires the day it is sent. A skill does not. Once you can locate the cycle, read a month, and time a stock against its founding date, no one needs to read it for you again. You can run the same practice in five years and in twenty, on markets that do not exist yet, because the clock underneath them is the same one. The method is yours for the rest of your career.
Before access opens you submit one photo: your face beside your government-issued photo ID, through a secure portal. A member of the team reviews each submission by hand, and the NDA you sign covers redistribution, public teaching, and resale.
The refund clause: No change-of-mind refunds once access is released. This does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law. The verification step protects the community, not your right to a refund — if a submission needs work, the team resolves it with you directly before access is released. Read the terms before you enrol, because once you are in, the research is in your hands and we treat that transfer as final.
A short orientation module opens the course; the six working parts below follow it, and each one produces the input the next one needs. Built large to small, because the method only makes sense in that order — which is exactly what the 1938 book does not do.
I came to McWhirter the way most chart readers do, through Gann. The book promised the thing I wanted most: the month, read before it opened. Then I tried to apply it and stalled. The terms were astronomical, the examples were from 1929, and the steps were scattered across chapters that did not teach in order. To use a single line of it I had to learn an ephemeris, build the exchange's chart by hand, and translate her 1929 cases into the language of a market I actually trade.
Before that work, my months looked like everyone else's. I waited for price to confirm a turn, then called myself early. I had no sentence for the month ahead. I treated October like June and was surprised when it was not.
The work that followed was years of reading, testing, and refining the source. The thing that clicked was the sequence. You read the long cycle first, then the month, then the single stock — and a monthly reading means one thing in a rising phase and another near a low. Out of order, the method is noise. In order, it holds.
After that I could state a directional bias before a month opened, place it inside the long tide, and review it honestly when price disagreed. The forecast went in my own hand on the first of the month, and the month either confirmed it or taught me something. The book stopped being a museum piece. It became a working practice I run every month.
I teach it now because the alternative is watching the method decay into a slogan. The honest answer is that careful study survives only when it is taught carefully, to a small room, by someone who has done the work. That is what this course is.
You locate the economy inside the 18.6-year cycle McWhirter traced in the sky. You learn the expansion, warning, and low phases, and how the slow-moving secondary factors modify the baseline. The output is a five-year outlook you build yourself. It becomes the context for every monthly reading that follows.
You learn the exchange's own founding chart, its harmonic turning points and angles. You overlay each recurring lunar-month chart to produce the bias for the coming month. You state the forecast before the month opens, then watch price confirm or reject it. Assignments require a working monthly forecast before you move on.
You build charts for the stocks you follow against their incorporation dates. You learn to recognise which windows open opportunity and which call for caution. Commodities are covered with the same logic. You walk the U.S. Steel case yourself and keep your own worked record of it.
You add David Williams' solar-ingress method and running totals as a monthly climate layer. The two methods read cleanly together. You bring them into a single twelve-month practice and learn the workflow discipline that keeps it honest month after month. This is the synthesis at the centre of the method.
The exchange has a founding chart. So do you. This module turns the same timing logic inward, so you can read your own decision-making months the way you read the market's — recognising when your own timing supports acting on a forecast and when it argues for patience. It sits alongside the core method, not underneath it; Parts 1 through 4 stand on their own without it.
The course does not stop being built the day you enrol. This module holds the running updates, including the Secondary Factors web app, which automates part of the calculation Part 2 teaches you to do by hand. You are joining on the current version of the material, which teaches the complete method end to end — a further upgrade is already in progress, and when it ships, it is added to what you already own, at no extra cost.
No change-of-mind refunds once access is released. This does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law — but it does mean the work has to earn its place on its own, stage by stage, rather than on a promise you could walk back. So here is the capability at each stage.
Two things stand in for testimonials here. McWhirter's documented 1938 cases, and the worked record you keep as you learn. Both are dated. Both are checkable.
Four things, and the labels matter more than the numbers. 1929: written up nine years later as a demonstration of the index, not a call she made at the time. U.S. Steel: 27½ in March 1935 to 126½ in March 1937 — roughly 360% — and then about 70% of it handed back by the stock itself into the 1938 low, written up after the move. March 1938: a month read as unstable from its own lunation chart, printed in a book published later that same year, so we call it a worked demonstration rather than a documented live call. 1950: the long cycle carried forward twelve years in print, with no hindsight available — the only forward claim in the volume, and the one worth testing. Three retrospectives and one projection, each dated and open to inspection. That is the only kind of proof we will stand behind.

You do not take the record on faith. In Part 3 you rebuild the U.S. Steel window yourself, from the cycle position up, and see whether the founding-date reading holds. From Part 2 onward you state a monthly bias before the month opens and log how price answers it. After a year you are not holding a testimonial. You are holding a stack of your own dated forecasts, with the hits and the misses both written down. That record is the only proof that matters to a serious student, because it is the one you made.

Complete checkout via the secure page. Your enrolment immediately enters manual review. You will receive a confirmation.
NDA and identity verification protect the student files and the research process. Access is released after verification is complete. If a submission needs work, the team resolves it with you directly before access opens.
Open Part 1 and locate the long cycle. From there you build your five-year macro outlook, then your first monthly forecast. You write it down before the month opens, then watch the date arrive. The lessons are self-paced, and your working files are yours for life.
No. Part 1 builds the cycle reading from the ground up. You need to be comfortable with a price chart, which most readers of this letter already are. The astronomical terms are taught as you need them, in plain language.
The book is the snapshot. The course is the construction logic. The 1938 text gives you theory in one chapter, history in another, and application in a third, in astronomical language, with examples from 1929. You can read every word and still not know which layer to build first.
The course supplies the sequence the book scatters, the reading of a modern exchange, the software that removes the hand calculation, and assignments that make you produce a working forecast before you move on. The free PDF gives you the terms. Part 2 gives you the practice.
The instruments changed. The clocks did not. The long cycle still runs its 18.6-year circuit and the lunar month still arrives on its own recurring schedule. Part 4 teaches the modern application, and the course teaches what to do when a market inverts from the forecast — what we call the polarity flip.
It will be, some months. The record contains inversions — markets expressing the expected pressure in the opposite direction — and the out-of-sample record since 1938 is genuinely mixed rather than uniformly confirming. “Polarity flip” is this school’s own name for the dynamic, not a term of McWhirter’s, and the course teaches you to watch for it rather than pretend it cannot happen.
The discipline is the answer. Treat each month as a probability, state the bias, then watch how price responds and review the result. A wrong forecast you reviewed is study. A wrong forecast you ignored is a habit. The method that hides its misses is the one to distrust.
No. A signal service hands you a chart photograph and an alert. This teaches you to read the date ahead yourself. You leave with the method, not a feed of buy and sell calls. If you want alerts, this is the wrong room.
Yes, as a front-end filter. You take long setups when the monthly bias is bullish and treat the same setups with suspicion when it is bearish. The method gives your order-flow work a directional context it does not generate on its own.
The integration. McWhirter read the month from the Moon. Williams read the year from the Sun. Part 4 joins the two into one annual practice, so a monthly bias arrives inside a yearly frame and two independent clocks check each other.
That synthesis, taught in sequence and paired with the software that removes the hand calculation, is not something you assemble from the free book alone. The free text is one author. The course is the working method that grew from translating, testing, and pairing her with Williams.
You produce your first monthly forecast in Part 2, after the cycle work in Part 1. The lessons are self-paced. The baseline is reachable in weeks of serious study, and the rest of your career is spent refining it. Your working files are kept for life.
The current version. It teaches the complete method end to end — the long cycle, the monthly bias, the single-stock timing, and the Williams synthesis — and it is what every case and worksheet in this letter refers to. A further upgrade to the tooling and lessons is already in progress. You do not pay again for it: when it ships, it is added to the access you already own, the same as every refinement before it.
This is the build, not the service. You leave with a method you run yourself, not a stream of buy and sell alerts. If you want someone to read the chart for you, a subscription will suit you better.
The method gives probability, not a command. Markets invert, the out-of-sample record since 1938 is mixed, and this page says so in three separate places rather than one. A reader who needs to be told exactly what will happen, with no room for a flip, will be frustrated here. The honest version of this work includes the months it gets wrong, and the discipline of reviewing them.
Watching the videos gives you theory. The capability lives in your own worked forecasts and your own reviews, month after month. The method is small; the practice is years. If you will not build alongside the lessons and keep the record, the no-change-of-mind-refund clause is not in your favour. This room rewards study, not viewing.
This is education, not advice. It does not account for your situation, and it is not a substitute for a qualified professional. If you need personal financial counsel, seek a licensed adviser.
Seven modules, 106 lessons. A five-year outlook, a monthly bias before the month opens, timing windows from the founding date, one annual practice, a personal timing layer, and the ongoing updates that keep it current. The Gann Time Table course free. Yours for life, in a room of 150.
A room of 150 · Worldwide · Verified
A reactive trader asks what the chart did today. You will ask what kind of month the market has entered — and answer it before it opens.
The line you cross. On one side of it you wait for the chart to confirm a turn, then call yourself early. On the other you write a bias down in your own hand before the month opens, place it inside the long tide, and let the date arrive to confirm or correct you. You stop reading photographs of the past. That is not a tool you rent. It is a kind of researcher you become.
What another season of waiting costs. Not a discount. Cases. This skill compounds one worked month at a time, and the judgement lives in the stack, not in the videos. Start this month and next August you are holding twelve dated forecasts with the misses logged beside the hits. Start next autumn and you are holding three. Keep meaning to start and you are holding the same 1938 PDF you have had open in a browser tab for two years, and the clock will have moved regardless.
And exactly what changes hands. Seven modules, 106 lessons, taught in her sequence rather than the book’s. Everything below is included, once, for one payment.
Enrolment process — After payment, complete a two-minute identity check via Stripe (government ID + selfie) and sign a non-disclosure agreement. Course access is issued after both are reviewed.
No change-of-mind refunds once access is released. This does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
P.S. — If you scrolled straight here, take the whole case in one paragraph. Louise McWhirter did not predict the 1929 crash; she was thirty-two and unpublished at the time, and the famous chapter was written nine years later. Any page implying otherwise is lying to you, and I would rather lose the sale than be that page. What she actually did, in that same 1938 book, was carry the long business cycle forward to 1950 — twelve years of phase positions printed in advance, with no hindsight available and no way to revise them quietly afterwards. That projection is the strongest thing in her work and the first case this course puts in your hands. The method behind it is financial astrology, stated plainly, and its record since 1938 contains real inversions of her original reading, which I have printed here rather than let you find in month seven. What you are buying is the 106 lessons that rebuild it in the sequence the book scrambles: the long cycle, then the month, then the single stock, then the Williams annual layer. AUD $1,994, once, lifetime access, in a room capped at 150 students worldwide. Enrol here — AUD $1,994 →
P.P.S. — On what the money buys: seven modules and 106 lessons — a short orientation, then the long cycle, the monthly bias, the single stock, the Williams annual layer, personal timing, and the running course updates. The Gann Financial Time Table course is included free. You are enrolling on Version 1, which teaches the complete method end to end; Version 2 is in development and lands in your account at no extra cost when it ships. There is no renewal and nothing to re-purchase. The room holds 150 students worldwide — that cap protects the study rather than running a countdown clock, and when it fills, enrolment closes until a place opens. Every month you wait is a worked forecast you will never own.
P.P.P.S. — No change-of-mind refunds once access is released. This does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law. If you will not state a forecast, watch the date, and review the result, the method will not serve you. If you will, you join a small room and keep the practice for the rest of your career.